|
1 |
|
|
1.1 |
How languages express "state of affairs" arguments |
|
|
1.2 |
Bresnan's (1982 ) account of control |
|
|
1.3 |
Grammatical functions and argument structure |
|
2 |
|
|
2.1 |
Objective voice alternations on derived transitive and |
|
|
|
ditransitive verbs |
|
3 |
|
|
3.1 |
Evidence for the Surface Ergative Analysis |
|
|
3.2 |
What can be controlled? |
|
|
3.3 |
What can be a controller? |
|
4 |
|
|
4.1 |
Verbs with three semantic arguments |
|
|
|
4.1.1 |
Proposed representation at argument-structure |
|
|
4.2 |
Verbs with two semantic arguments |
|
|
|
4.2.1 |
edot: an orientation verb |
|
|
|
4.2.2 |
n/tegarang: a commitment verb |
|
|
|
4.2.3 |
Raising verbs |
|
|
4.3 |
Verbs with a single semantic argument representing a |
|
|
|
"state of affairs" |
|
|
|
4.3.1 |
Proposed representation at argument-structure |
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Created: 3 June 1998
Last modified: 12 June 1998
Authorised by: P. Austin, Professor and HOD, Linguistics and Applied Linguistics
Access: International
Copyright © 1998, The University of Melbourne.
Maintainer:
Simon Musgrave